Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Denby et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby, Nubian Sankofa, Mitchell Stasney and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown Lane, Unknown McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00659
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, Paul Hall, Unknown McNeil and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Freeman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Neil et al
as 2:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
George P Jones, II
Defendant:
Unknown Neil, Unknown Party, Unknown McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Staffs Host et al
as 3:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Staffs Host, ARP Medical Counsolor, I.L.A.P. Administration Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Unknown Thomas, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Nurses, Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF MDOC Director et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF MDOC Director, Staff Host of Them, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Jr. v. Gradie et al
as 4:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Gradie, Unknown McNeil, James Holmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones vs. Caskey, et al.
as 4:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Sandra Atwood, Patrisha Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones vs. Caskey, et al.
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
James C. Jones
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Sandra Atwood, Patrisha Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
