Cases 11 - 20 of 415
VERA REINA v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv04212
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS MIGUEL VERA REINA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bostick et al v. Stevens et al
as 1:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
DeAdrian Bostick and Destiny Merritt
Defendant:
C Stevens, C Vera, Jay Howarth, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Vera v. Reed
as 1:2023cv01057
Petitioner:
G Memo Vera
Respondent:
Melinda Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOULDER COUNTY JAIL, SEAN METCALF, Badge #1469, BADGE #1418 and others
Barriera-Vera v. Warden of Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00390
Petitioner:
Jose Barriera-Vera
Respondent:
Warden of Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barriera-Vera v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
Jose T. Barriera-Vera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
(HC) Vera v. State of California
as 1:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
G. Memo Vera
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Nieto v. Gordon, et al
as 23-15788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MOISES NIETO
Defendant / Appellee:
GORDON, Warden, YORK, DIAZ-NAVARRO and others
Vera v. 5114 Rollingstone Road
as 4:2023cv01812
Petitioner:
Martha Vera
Respondent:
5114 Rollingstone Road
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harpo et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo, T. Mary Brown, Zeric Wideman and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Hunter, III, Carletta Sims-Brown, Vera L. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
