Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Hunter v. Meisner et al
as 2:2018cv01500
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Hunter
Defendant:
Sgt Wilcox, Capt Wesner, CO Muihalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osterman v. Kies et al
as 1:2017cv00517
Defendant:
John Kies, Nurse Klenke, Captain Wesner and others
Plaintiff:
Steven J Osterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streckenbach v. Meisner et al
as 2:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Streckenbach
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Sandra Hautamaki, David Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nigl v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Paul M Nigl
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Michael Meisner , Steven Schueler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Beamon, Jr. v. Michael Dittmann, et al
as 16-3545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST D. BEAMON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. DITTMANN, JASON WILKE, Captain, ANDREW WESNER, Lieutenant and others
Beamon v. Wilke
as 2:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Earnest D Beamon, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Dittman , Captain Wilke, Captain Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Sutton et al
as 2:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Aaron Moses Pena
Defendant:
J Sutton and Wesner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Riggins v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RIGGINS, aka Dawud Halisi Malik, AKA Dawud Halisi Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, DOC Secretary, RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent MICC, HOUSTON WIMBERLY, Counselor, MICC and others
Daniel Kasher v. E. Wesner, et al
as 08-3709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LEE KASHER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN R. GOETZ, E. GRANT WESNER, RICHARD FORRY, individually and in their official capacities and others
Defendant:
SANTINE MOYER and RONALD MOYER
Williams v. Lamas et al
as 3:2008cv05520
Plaintiff:
Derek V Williams
Defendant:
Santos Lamas, Mark Wesner, Lachney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
