Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 2:2022cv03274
Petitioner:
Johnny Wilds
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILDS v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
DONTAY WILDS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL, RON FREEMAN, CORRECT CARE SOLITIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne
Defendant:
Dale Schmidt, Sgt Polsin, Sgt Kuehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wild et al
as 2:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
LT Abbigate Wild, Lt Gahn, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James-El v. Stien
as 3:2021cv00275
Petitioner:
Harry Sharod James-El and Harry Sharod James
Respondent:
Josh Stien, Josh Stein, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSES v. WILDE et al
as 1:2021cv00480
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, Anthony Wilde and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
Pete L. Moses, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley, Brandon v. Weber, Leigha et al
as 3:2021cv00321
Defendant:
Robert Beahm, Joseph Beahm, CO Adderton and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Wilde et al
as 5:2021hc02128
Respondent:
United States, Anthony Wilde and State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Pete L. Moses, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Sheriff of Dodge County et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Does #1-30, Tammy Wild, Brian Drumm and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldrup v. Wilde et al
as 1:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Anthony Wilde and Dawn MacMahan
Plaintiff:
Robert A.D. Waldrup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
