Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Snipes v. Duffield Regional Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00542
Defendant:
Cpl. Osborne, Duffield Regional Jail, Officer Ryan Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Wolfgang Vonmozart Snipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfgang v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv24155
Plaintiff:
Reno Wolfgang
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfgang v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv00487
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Reno Wolfgang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VON VADER, WOLFGANG M. v. USA
as 3:2017cv00931
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Von Vader, Wolfgang M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ward v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Demontray Larell Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Wolfgang, Hoffa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruach El et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2017cv01915
Plaintiff:
Qadim Ruach El, Ameenah Adilah El, S.A EL and others
Defendant:
Susan Chang, Charleston County Department of Social Services, Ajoni Holmes Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borchardt-Kanoholani v. Hayden
as 5:2017cv03100
Plaintiff:
Wolfgang Borchardt-Kanoholani
Defendant:
Kalvin Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, BLOSS, WOLFGANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
