Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 15,520
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20261
Petitioner: Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jackson v. O'Connell
as 1:2024cv04858
Plaintiff: Timothy Jackson
Defendant: Margaret M O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Goss v. Shane Jackson
as 24-6563
Petitioner: DARRELL L. GOSS
Respondent: WARDEN SHANE D. JACKSON
Phillips v. McCrary et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: Bobby Joe Phillips
Defendant: Captain Unknown McCrary, Warden Donald Jackson, Lt. Mrs. Unknown Evans and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Chestnut
as 2:2024cv01087
Petitioner: Tayan Jackson
Respondent: Warden C. Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andre Jackson v. USA
as 24-1996
Petitioner: ANDRE W. JACKSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chambers v. Floyd County Sheriff et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: Alvin S. Chambers
Defendant: Floyd County Sheriff, Sgt. Barton, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: David Darnell Jackson
Defendant: Commissioner Burl Cain, Management and Training Corporation and Unknown Unknown
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner: Khalil M Jackson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner: KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent: U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?