Cases 21 - 30 of 19,336
Smith v. Slease
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joshua P. Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Slease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv06910
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, P. REX, MARIO VIERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Eric P. King
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Rose v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6556
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROSE
Defendant:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections
Michael Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward C, et al
as 24-11913
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. FILLMORE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR BROWARD COUNTY, MICHAEL J. SATZ, CHRISTINA STRANDELL and others
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacque Oliphant v. Judge Eric P. Harmon et al
as 2:2024cv04820
Plaintiff:
Jacque Oliphant
Defendant:
Judge Eric P. Harmon, District Attorney Christopher Gray, Probation Officer Herman Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Bonilla v. Judge Erica P. Grosjean
as 2:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Judge Erica P. Grosjean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Thomas
as 7:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice v. Dawson et al
as 8:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chad L. Grice
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Dawson, Assistant Warden B. Walden, Assistant Warden P. Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
