Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,339
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff: Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant: Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Adam Lane
Defendant: Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff: Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant: Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conrady v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03078
Petitioner: Wyatt A. Conrady
Respondent: Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant: PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner: Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent: Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buford v. Payne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff: Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant: Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff: Robert Murray
Defendant: City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff: Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Philip P Frederic
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?