Cases 21 - 30 of 275
Jess Smith v. Ellis, et al
as 23-35085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESS RICHARD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIS, Sgt., C.U.S. JONES, THOMAS L'HEUREUX and others
Jordan Whitaker v. Michael Dempsey, et al
as 23-1086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN WHITAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DEMPSEY, Doctor, BRANDT BOEL, Lieutenant and MICHAEL CASTENADO, Officer
Berman v. Brandt
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Leland Jason Berman
Respondent:
RRM Phoenix and Matthew Brandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Headlee v. Santini
as 1:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Brandt Headlee
Defendant:
G. Santini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv03125
Petitioner:
Jacob Newman
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Matthew Brandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Elliott v. Brandt et al
as 3:2022cv02668
Plaintiff:
Lason Elliot and Lason Elliott
Defendant:
Derek Brandt and Anthony D. Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brezonick v. Brandt
as 1:2022cv02823
Petitioner:
Matthew Brezonick
Respondent:
Matthew Brandt
Interested Party:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pounds v. Charles Mix County et al
as 4:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Pounds
Defendant:
Charles Mix County Jail, Randy Thaler, Erica Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Brandt et al
as 3:2022cv05490
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Traivon Bonds
Defendant:
Brandt, Emily Cox and Gregory L Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. CIRILLO et al
as 2:2022cv03752
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
GUY CIRILLO, TONY BROWN, ANTONIO PIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
