Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Everette Peeples v. Leon Dixion
as 15-6310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETTE L. PEEPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON DIXION, Doctor / N.C.C., DOCTOR EMRAN, DOCTOR / SUSSEX STATE PRISON, DOCTOR HARRIS, DOCTOR / St. Brides C.C. and others
Barriera v. Virginia et al
as 2:2014cv00642
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vincent Barriera
Defendant:
Virginia, St. Brides, Hawke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barriera v. Virginia et al
as 1:2014cv08880
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vncent Barriera
Defendant:
Virginia, St. Brides, Hawke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Patterson v. Mr. Schuyler
as 14-6972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SCHUYLER, Intelligence Officer, MR. PIXLEY, Warden of St. Brides Corr. Ct. and WENDY HOBBS, Regional Administrator
Edward Davis v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6482
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD LEE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director and W. PIXLEY, Warden, St. Brides Correctional Center
Terrance Palmer v. Wendall Pixley
as 14-6199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE S. PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden, MR. LOVETT, Captain/Watch Commander, SPEIGHTS, Safety Officer and others
Winston v. Klindworth et al
as 3:2013cv03332
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Brett A Klindworth and Bride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bride v. McClintock
as 4:2013cv00136
Petitioner:
Titus T Bride
Respondent:
Susan McClintock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chisolm v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00625
Defendant:
Jack E. Bride, Don Cazayoux and James M. LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisolm v. Cazayoux et al
as 3:2012cv00139
Defendant:
Jack E. Bride and Don Cazayoux
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
