Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Byrnes v. Alderson HSU et al
as 1:2016cv03609
Plaintiff:
Linda L. Byrnes
Defendant:
Alderson HSU, Swider and Breckenridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Breckenridge v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Brian E Breckenridge
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Breckenridge v. Noble County Sherriffs et al
as 5:2013cv01304
Plaintiff:
Steven Breckenridge
Defendant:
Noble County Sheriffs Department, Noble County District Attorney Office and Perry Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breckenridge v. Perry Police Department et al
as 5:2013cv01275
Plaintiff:
Steven Breckenridge
Defendant:
Perry Police Department, Noble County Sheriffs Department and Noble County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Breckenridge v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 13-7849
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. BRECKENRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and MICHAEL HALLAHAN, Defense Counsel
Stribling v. Defazio et al
as 2:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Stribling
Defendant:
J. Defazio, R. Masterson, T. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breckenridge v. Manis
as 7:2012cv00518
Petitioner:
William F. Breckenridge
Respondent:
Carl A. Manis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breckenridge v. Barksdale
as 7:2011cv00487
Respondent:
Earl R. Barksdale
Petitioner:
William F. Breckenridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Ives
as 2:2011cv00206
Petitioner:
Herbert Breckenridge Porter
Respondent:
Richard Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
