Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Willis v. Gate a CIA
as 3:2022cv01584
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Gate a CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. US Customs & Border Protection et al
as 5:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
US Customs & Border Protection and CIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Junior Tejeda v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2022cv01568
Plaintiff:
Junior Tejeda
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Unknown CIA Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMS v. CIA
as 4:2022cv00300
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN S SIMMS
Respondent:
CIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mowery v. 1st Shift Unit C19 C/O Mrs. Richardson et al
as 1:2022cv03553
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Mowery
Defendant:
1st Shift Unit CIA, 2nd Shift Unit CIA, 2nd Shift Unit Cia Sargent T.B.N and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephenson
Defendant:
Carlene Davis, Angel Quiros, Kristine Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Rollings v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, FCI Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Rollings v. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, F.C.I Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shorts v. CIA et al
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Felton Shorts
Defendant:
CIA, NOPD, G. B. Restaurants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
Jesse Campbell, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Kristine Barone, CIA (Ret.) William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
