Cases 21 - 30 of 83
DAVID v. WRAY et al
as 2:2022cv03243
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVID
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, ALFRED GRASSO, KURT KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Brackett v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
Demond Charles Brackett
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Christopher A. Wray, Sean Ragan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brackett v. Wray et al
as 2:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Demond Charles Brackett
Defendant:
Christopher A. Wray, Merrick Garland, Sean Ragan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Keel et al
as 4:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Mark Keel, Henry McMaster and Christopher A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
