Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Rodriguez v. Joyner
as 5:2018cv02294
Respondent:
Warden H Joyner
Petitioner:
Cosme D Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC)Tommy Mackey v. Goss et al
as 1:2018cv00988
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, J. Garcia, D. Goss and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2017cv10057
Plaintiff:
Jerome Sanders
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, T. Smith, Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHINELO v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Madu J. Chinelo
Respondent:
D. Rodriguez, N AMANDJWALA, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHINELO v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 4:2016cv00739
Plaintiff:
MADU J CHINELO
Defendant:
D RODRIGUEZ, N AMANDJWALA, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv02944
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GARNER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN MORALES, SATISH LIMBEKAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
John Banda, Jr. v. S. Adams, et al
as 16-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. BANDA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ADAMS, Unit Director (sued in her individual capacity), M. MAIN, Director (sued in his individual capacity), Y. CORNIEL, Program Coordinator & Treatment Team Member (sued in her Individual capacity) and others
Rodriguez v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2015cv01754
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kelly Harrington and Stuart Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Conrad v. D. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2015cv04537
Plaintiff:
David Conrad
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Complex Lompoc CA, Jack Fox and others
Rodriguez v. Stephens
as 3:2015cv00080
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Cesar D. Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
