Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Marcus Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-15589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS B. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, D. E. MALLARD, Assist Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv04405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BAKER v. DURHAM COUNTY S.W.A.T. TEAM et al
as 1:2014cv00878
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSHUA BAKER
Defendant:
DURHAM COUNTY S.W.A.T. TEAM and D. E. FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2014cv01054
Plaintiff:
Warren Junius Massey
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, M. S. Allen, M. I. Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Chance v. W. Anthony, et al
as 14-16580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CHANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
W. V. ANTHONY, K. BRANDON, K. L. MCGUYER and others
Roldan v. Crews et al
as 3:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Marcos Roldan, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Warden Barnes, Assistant Warden R. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. COMERFORD et al
as 4:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
ROMERIO L WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD COMERFORD , MICHAEL D CREWS , GLENN RICHBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Manuel Sanchez
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Wayne Ashton and D E A Agent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Eddie Young v. C. Chapman, et al
as 14-15888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
C. J. CHAPMAN, Individual Capacity, A. D. RISENHOOVER, Individual Capacity, D. E. MOUNT, Individual Capacity and others
Richard Huffman v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-17331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HUFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Doe, SIS- VSP Tucson, D. E. GUZZMAN, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
