Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Couch v. Marshall et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Couch
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Officer Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Marshall et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00588
Plaintiff:
Alvin James Johnson
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Sergeant Blair, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Montgomery County Detention Facility et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
David Thomas
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility, Lowndes County Detention Facility, D. T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate et al v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
Marcus Orlando Tate and Joe Willie Reese
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, L. T. Rodgers and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate v. Marshall et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Marcus Orlando Tate
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and L. T. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Marshall (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alvin James Johnson
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bullock v. Bates et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00977
Plaintiff:
James Timothy Bullock
Defendant:
Dr. Bates, Gina Savage, Montgomery County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. Baylor et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Defendant:
Arthur Baylor, Bobby Bright, Officer Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tatum v. Marshall et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Christopher Tatum
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Johnny Hardwick, Eleanor I. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
