Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Tillman et al v. Flagler County et al
as 3:2017cv00767
Plaintiff:
Tremayne D.S. Tillman, Pariate St. Claire Moore, Markell Peck and others
Defendant:
Flagler County, Flagler County Detention Center, City of Bunnell, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher D.S. Sudduth Sr. v. Dave Davey
as 2:2016cv03561
Respondent:
Dave Davey
Petitioner:
Christopher D.S. Sudduth, Sr
Smolen v. Fischer
as 13-4265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Comm. Brian Fischer, Supt. Ada Perez, C.O. M. Miller and others
Bennett v. Habeck
as 12-4057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Bennett
Defendant - Appellee:
D.S. D. Habeck, of franklin (Hearing Officer) of Corr. Fac., Jamie Stearns, (CFFAII) of Franklin Corr. Fac., CO. McGrath, of Franklin Corr. Fac. and others
Peyton v. Clark et al
as 7:2012cv00481
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, D.S. Combs, Sgt. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Peyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smolen v. Fischer et al
as 1:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Ada Perez, M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sewell v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2011cv01584
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin, Stotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmy Tyson v. Woodford
as 11-16262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMMY RAY TYSON, AKA Muwakkil D.S. Al-Hizbullahi, AKA Timmy Ray Tyson, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WOODFORD
Dwight Whetstone v. R. Ellers, et al
as 11-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT WHETSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. S. ELLERS, Dir. M.H.C. Serv. (Pa. Doc.), STANLEY STANISH, STANLEY BOHINSKI and others
Smith v. Cobb, et al.
as 1:2009cv01726
Plaintiff:
Phillippe' L. Smith
Defendant:
Cobb, Zaragosa, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
