Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Day v. Reed
as 2:2013cv01043
Plaintiff:
Burton Day
Defendant:
David Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Municipality of Suffolk County
as 13-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde J. Jennings
Defendant:
Transportating Police Officer John Doe, Shield #5729, Stationhouse Detective John Doe, Shield #4096, Police Department Cell Attendant, Shield #116 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Municipality of Suffolk County, Steve Levy, County Executive, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Calhoun-El v. Watson et al
as 1:2012cv02384
Defendant:
Randall Watson, Jon P. Galley, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Reed v. ABC 27 Lancaster
as 12-1970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID REED
Defendant - Appellee:
ABC 27 LANCASTER
Reed v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00955
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Floyd David Reed
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. ABC 27 IN LANCASTER et al
as 5:2011cv02005
Plaintiff:
DAVID REED
Defendant:
ABC 27 IN LANCASTER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. LEBANON PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2011cv02053
Plaintiff:
DAVID REED
Defendant:
LEBANON PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. LEBANON POLICE DEPT.
as 2:2011cv02054
Plaintiff:
DAVID REED
Defendant:
LEBANON POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Livingston
as 1:2011cv00156
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
Floyd David Reed
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. The Municipality of Suffolk County et al
as 2:2011cv00911
Defendant:
Mr. Mark Auerbach, Ms. Tracy Busch, Police Officer Michael J. Cammarata and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde J. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
