Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner: PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent: U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wesley Carroll v. Department of the Army
as 11-12044
Plaintiff - Appellant: WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Brown v. Department of the Army We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05560
Plaintiff: Lawrence Hilton Brown
Defendant: Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00560
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03625
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01200
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lindsey v. Department of the Army Review Board
as 2:2008cv00100
Plaintiff: Randy C. Lindsey
Defendant: Department of the Army Review Board
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dupree v. Department of Defense et al
as 7:2008cv00066
Plaintiff: Willis E. Dupree
Defendant: Department of Defense and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GAMBLE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 1:2008cv00207
Plaintiff: FREDERICK M. GAMBLE
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?