Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Anderson v. Wang et al
as 7:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
William Lee Anderson, II
Defendant:
Dr. Laurance Shu Chang Wang and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gene Myers
Defendant:
Connie Johnson, Amanda Merriott and Dr. Mark Winchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moody v. Geter et al
as 2:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Moody
Defendant:
L. Geter, FNU, LNU C.O.s, D. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Marquez et al
as 1:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
Jose Colon
Defendant:
Dr. Ramon Marquez, Dr. Mirella Susnjar, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jouv'ert v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06080
Plaintiff:
Rudolpho Enrique Jouv'ert
Defendant:
The City of New York, Francisco Zorrosa, Kathleen Coulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Centurion et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jones
Defendant:
Centurion, Dr. Mark Fowler, Dr. (f/n/u) Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. Patton et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Kevin Daugherty
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Patton, TLC Board, Dr. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Laybourn et al
as 5:2021ct03295
Plaintiff:
Trevor Eugene Reed
Defendant:
Dr. Katherine Laybourn, Dr. Mark Dicocco, Ms. Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbati v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2021cv00921
Defendant:
Joseph Pozzo, N. Lalashuis, Sergeant Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barbati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
