Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Albert Anderson v. Eric Dye
as 23-6265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC DYE, Warden, Alexander CI, FNU LNU, Medical Provider, Alexander CI, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Warden, Alexander CI and others
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marcos F. Santiago
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Dye, Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dye v. Plaster et al
as 7:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ryan Dye
Defendant:
Christopher Plaster, Katie Gallagher, Richard Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Alsbrook et al
as 7:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ryan Dye
Defendant:
Rick Alsbrook, Shantae Kulchar, Randy Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, FNU Dye, Richard Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Woodard
as 1:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dye
Defendant:
Susan Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Reaves
Defendant:
Reynolds, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Henry County Sherriffs Office et al
as 7:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dye
Defendant:
Henry County Sherriffs Office and Henry County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
