Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Bell v. Scott et al
as 6:2013cv03389
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Scott, M.D., Corizon, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02097
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Scott, M.D., Corizon, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston et al v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles A Winston
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc, Joe E Hughes, Geraldine G Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell vs. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01314
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Harry Campbell, III v. Ricardo Rios, et al
as 13-2382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY G. CAMPBELL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
RICARDO RIOS, Warden, PAT QUINN, TAMMY GIRARD and others
Campbell v. Iser
as 1:2013cv01749
Plaintiff:
Courtny G. Campbell
Defendant:
Sgt. Iser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry Campbell, III v. Jeff Norman
as 13-2271
Petitioner - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeff Norman, Warden
Joel Whitney v. J. Walker, et al
as 13-15579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL P. WHITNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WALKER, Chief, California Prison Health Care Services, ELLEN GREENMAN, M.D., MD, Chief Medical Officer - Avenal State Prison, DONALD B. MCELROY, CEO- Health Care Services, ASP and others
Tatom v. Corizon Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Tatom, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Gordon, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Rios et al
as 1:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Rios, Pat Quinn, Tammy Girard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
