Cases 21 - 30 of 220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Santos Neris Grimaldi v. F.C.I. Gilmer, W. VA et al
as 2:2022cv05425
Petitioner:
Santos Neris Grimaldi
Respondent:
F.C.I. Gilmer, W. VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McFarland v. Barba et al
as 4:2022cv00720
Plaintiff:
DeMarco L. McFarland
Defendant:
Kyle Barba, Jay A Godsy and Joan M Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Hong et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
Chaplain Y. Hong, D. Husk, C.O. D. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Darden v. FCI Gilmer (Unit Manager Lindsey (Mr.)) et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Kennin K. Darden
Respondent:
FCI Gilmer (Unit Manager Lindsey (Mr.)) and Warden Name
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Desper v. Warden - FCI Gilmer
as 5:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
John Benjamin Desper
Respondent:
Warden - FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tyrone Wallace v. Erving
as 22-6048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE R. WALLACE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERVING, GAINER, LIEUTENANT GRUNDY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MOODY, Transportation Officer, JOHN DOE, Lieutenant - compound officer and THE RESPONSE TEAM
Primus v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
Andre Turner Primus
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pate v. Gilmer et al
as 4:2021cv01488
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cortez Pate
Defendant:
Joan M. Gilmer and Honorable Philip M. Hess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmer Jr v. USA
as 3:2021cv00980
Petitioner:
Gregory Gilmer Jr and Gregory Gilmer, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
