Cases 21 - 30 of 10,044
Green v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00730
Defendant:
Security Management LLC, Anthony McDowell, Chad Ezell and others
Plaintiff:
Blaine Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cole et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Defendant:
Michael Boyer, FNU Green, FNU Knowles and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv03975
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Ramane Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jack v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv01495
Defendant:
Sean McCorkle, McCulley, Suydam and others
Plaintiff:
Nygel Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Green
as 5:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Transportation Officer Green
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. Warden Greene
as 3:2024cv01133
Petitioner:
Ronald Goss
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cruz, Francisco v. Menard et al
as 1:2024cv23395
Defendant:
Menard, Maldonado, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Weston
as 6:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Gary Devon Green
Defendant:
Judge Kathryn Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas v. Maury Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2024ct03210
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Galeas Menchu-El, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, Amanda Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
