Cases 21 - 30 of 319
Miller v. Walston et al
as 5:2023ct03056
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Miller
Defendant:
Wade Walston, Mr. Sauls, T. Peele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jokinen v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dylan Aaron Jokinen
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent J. Miller, SGT M. Dinucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrion v. Kopp et al
as 1:2022cv09445
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Vartecon Campbell and Gilbert Vartecon Carrion
Defendant:
Marilyn Kopp, Courtney Griffen, Manager P. Doulan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Defendant:
J. Miller, Lt. Kenyon, Lt. Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01554
Petitioner:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Respondent:
J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald E. Booker v. J. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv07644
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
J. Miller, J. Williams, Lisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Capps et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ernie Perez
Defendant:
Joe Capps, J. Miller, J. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. BODKIN et al
as 1:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
L. BODKIN and J. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. BODKIN et al
as 1:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
L. BODKIN and J. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
