Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Bacote v. Parks
as 1:2019cv01001
Plaintiff:
Marlon Bacote
Defendant:
James Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. Parks et al
as 9:2018cv03286
Defendant:
Officer James Parks, Nurse Donna Miller, Southern Health Partners Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Head
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downey v. Parks et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Downey
Defendant:
James Parks and Adrian Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson, et al
as 17-55092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Locklear v. Walrath et al
as 1:2016cv03128
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Locklear, Jr.
Defendant:
John Walrath, Theresa Dowell, Scott Lasorso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin P. Rivera v. Harold W. Clarke
as 16-6006
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN P. RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, TRACY RAY, Offender Management Services, JAMES PARKS, Offender Management Services and others
Crayton v. MCV et al
as 1:2015cv01125
Plaintiff:
Philip Darius Crayton
Defendant:
MCV, Medical Administrator, Lt. Charity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Clark et al
as 2:2015cv00143
Petitioner:
Kevin P. Rivera
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark, Tracy Ray, James Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrell Parks v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 15-1647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
