Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
(HC) Cardoso v. Robinson
as 1:2019at00759
Defendant: jose jeronimo cardoso and James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glinsey v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv03246
Defendant: C Watson, John Baldwin, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Lamontreal Glinsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05397
Defendant: Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff: John James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2019cv04615
Plaintiff: Daniel James Robinson
Defendant: Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04336
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner: Allen James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv02437
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Lewis James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson et al v. Continental Inn Programs Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00806
Plaintiff: Phyllis Aretha Walker and Roylin James Robinson
Defendant: James Broderick, Marva Bradley, Continental Inn Programs Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2019cv00805
Plaintiff: Phyllis Aretha Walker and Roylin James Robinson
Defendant: Travis Roberts, Robert Gualtieri, Keith Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connell v. Poynter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00668
Defendant: Sergeant Philips, James Robinson, T. Poynter and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Alan Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00878
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner: JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?