Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Baltierra v. Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00664
Defendant:
Adams County, Colorado, Corizon Health, Inc., Michael McIntosh and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Baltierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Carter v. Brad Livingston, Director, et al
as 17-50947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE L. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOE GRIMES, Director of Prison and Jail Operations for Region IV and others
McDonald v. Thompson
as 1:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
Issac L. McDonald
Defendant:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Hedrick et al
as 1:2017cv00982
Defendant:
Kenneth Hedrick, Brown, Brock and others
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Robertson et al
as 2:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Travis James Thompson
Defendant:
Kyle Robertson, Dal Williamson, Jones County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Harmon
as 3:2017cv01598
Petitioner:
Christopher James Thompson
Respondent:
D J Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shapiro v. Darel, et al
as 1:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Shapiro
Defendant:
Daniel J. Darel and James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Thompson v. Frezin
as 16-17768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FREZIN
Carter v. Livingstone et al
as 5:2016cv01050
Defendant:
Jorge Alvarez, Terri Y. Driver, William Dubose, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. RECKTENWALD
as 1:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMPSON
Respondent:
MONICA RECKTENWALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
