Cases 21 - 30 of 1,961
Leatherberry v. Bahr et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Dirk Stolz, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
David Leatherberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, Lt. Dudek, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv06006
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, John Doe (3), John Doe (2) and others
Plaintiff:
Kionte R. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clinton Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00884
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Trafarrah Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Ball et al
as 3:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Berry., John Doe #3 and #4, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Regan v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01693
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00679
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Ron DeSantis and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coote v. Doe(s) 1 and 2 et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe(s) 4 - 11 and John Doe(s) 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Justin Miles Coote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DYKEMAN v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv07358
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3, R. BLIZZARD, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
