Cases 21 - 30 of 245
Jones v. Shinn
as 2:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
Dennis Jones
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dee Jones v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Darrick Dee Jones
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 3:2023cv08040
Petitioner:
James Lee Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ward v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Dwain A Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kauffman v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2023cv08030
Plaintiff:
Zion Zachary Kauffman
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Mohave County Superior Court, Mohave County Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kauffman v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2023cv08029
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Mohave County Superior Court, Mohave County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Puckett et al
as 3:2022cv08217
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren
Defendant:
Amber Puckett, Sumi Erno, Unknown James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez #061919 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
James A Sanchez
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Mattos, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas M James
Defendant:
David Shinn, Diana Labar, Jillian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
