Cases 21 - 30 of 369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Daniels v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ventress Correctional Facility, Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Braswell v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
William Larry Braswell, III
Defendant:
Sherriff Terry Langley, Major David Jordan, Captain Shawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creel v. Junker et al
as 5:2023ct03243
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Creel
Defendant:
Gary Junker, Dr. Arthur Campbell, Debra Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Langley
as 3:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
Justin Alan Jones
Respondent:
Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Nieto et al
as 3:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
William Michael Lucas
Defendant:
Tina Nieto, Olguin Banuelos, Gary Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
