Cases 21 - 30 of 250
Smith, Lontonio v. Tegels et al
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith
Defendant:
Tegels, Masson, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tegels et al
as 2:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith
Defendant:
Tegels, Masson, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Green v. Nurse Jones
as 22-7237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE JONES and DOCTOR LIU
Defendant:
NURSE ROGERS
(PC) Birrell v. DiTomas et al
as 2:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell and Bella-Christina Birrell
Defendant:
Michele Ditomas, Valerie T Liu and Denelda Footman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Allen
as 4:2022cv04491
Plaintiff:
Rodney Victor Coleman
Defendant:
T. Allen, J. Celaya, R Binkele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred Caraffa v. ADOC, et al
as 22-16130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA, named as Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTY, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
