Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01946
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, S Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pouncey v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Touche Jamar Pouncey
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services, C Lillie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CARL KELDIE, VALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Al Saud v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03845
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party, Inmate Legal Services and others
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Klalid Bin Talal Al Saud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McEnany v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv02767
Plaintiff:
William Todd McEnany
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio, Unknown Miceli, Unknown Gerdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miceli v. Patrick et al
as 5:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
Charles N Miceli
Defendant:
Jimmy Patrick, Christopher Gordy, D Garrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miceli v. Patrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Miceli
Defendant:
Jimmy Patrick, Christopher Gordy, D. Garrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miceli v. Crews et al
as 3:2014cv00957
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Miceli
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Warden Barnes, Assistant Warden R. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miceli v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00856
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Miceli
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections and Warden Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
