Cases 21 - 30 of 487
Brinson v. Macomb Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv12658
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Brinson, II
Respondent:
Macomb Correctional Facility
Jordan v. Houston et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Russell Houston and John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Freeman et al
as 3:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Freeman and Correctional Officer Gammage
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 4:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Michael Lee Catton, Nicholas Raymond Mark, Nicholas J. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Officer Michael Lee Catton, Officer Nicholas Raymond Mark, Officer Nicholas J Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perry v. Collins
as 2:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perry, Jr
Defendant:
Debrah Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Borowski
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perry, Jr
Defendant:
David Borowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
