Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Frazier v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Frazier
Defendant:
David Carter and Zach Wolverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv04090
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hull v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2016cv00180
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Michael Cherry, Brian Connett and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Din et al
as 3:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Raymond A. Din, AW, Donna S. Brubaker, SSA, R. Gysler, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobsen Jr v. Thienhaus et al
as 2:2016cv00331
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Michael Douglas, Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Craig L Jacobsen Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobsen Jr v. Douglas
as 2:2016cv00332
Defendant:
Drew Christensen, Michael Douglas, Esq. Willard Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Leslie Jacobsen Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2015cv02557
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin Hoshino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2015cv00272
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. STAFFORD
as 5:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JASON STAFFORD, FRANK TUBERVILLE and HARRY R PYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Holder et al
as 1:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Douglas
Defendant:
Bob Holder and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
