Cases 21 - 30 of 217
Raymond Bermudez v. J. Allison, et al
as 22-15483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND D. BERMUDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ALLISON, G. PONDER, R. BURGH and others
Ponder v. Fairley et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Billy Dewyane Ponder
Defendant:
Bobby C. Fairley, Burl Caine, Parole Board Jackson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. PONDER
as 4:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
DARRYL CORNELIUS DANIELS
Defendant:
PONDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PONDER v. WARDEN ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv19986
Plaintiff:
ERIC PONDER
Defendant:
WARDEN ORTIZ, OFFICER A. DILLON and OFFICER FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jerald Anthony Hall
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Aaron J Tompkins, Kevin L Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Senior Trooper John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder v. Finley et al
as 1:2021cv00718
Defendant:
Dr. Ellen N. Mace, R. Raup, Scott Finley and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Feeder, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Defendant:
City Of New York, Corrections Officers Johns Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06779
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Berkowitz, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Ponder et al
as 1:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Carella Jones, TBPP, Kourtney Ponder and others
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
