Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Harnage v. Furtick et al
as 3:2019cv00338
Defendant:
Valletta, Syed Naqui, William Mulligan and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. PEACH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, et al
as 5:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
RONALD TRAYVON WILLIS
Defendant:
PEACH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, WILLIS, COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Peach County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 1:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald Trayvon Willis
Defendant:
Peach County Law Enforcement Center, Willis, Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Decker et al
as 3:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
John Henry Allen
Defendant:
Andrew J. Decker, III, Sheena Holland, John Weston Peach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peaches v. Beachem et al
as 1:2017cv03003
Plaintiff:
Brojrick Peaches
Defendant:
Superintendent Beachem, Commander Tate, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00604
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
King v. Puershner et al
as 1:2017cv01373
Plaintiff:
Lionel Michael King
Defendant:
M.T. Puershner, M. Mokowski, Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bear v. Ross et al
as 6:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lance Xavier Bear
Defendant:
Peaches Ross, Unknown Walker and Unknown Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson #117045 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01095
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, GEO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Davis v. Fort Valley Georgia, et al
as 14-12233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FORT VALLEY GEORGIA, City of, TERRY DEESE, Peach County, Fort Valley Georgia, SMITH, Peach County, Fort Valley Georgia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
