Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Chavez v. Ware, et al
as 7:2015cv00028
Defendant:
Judge Chang, Judge David Counts, Judge Lisk and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. TOWNSHIP OF WINSLOW et al
as 1:2013cv04690
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WINSLOW, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, WALTER SCHILLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01653
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rivera v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2012cv01169
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. Santa Clara County Regional Center
as 3:2011cv03178
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Regional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Federal Judge Ware et al
as 5:2009cv01795
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Federal Judge Ware and Ron Gallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Perez v. Lindsay
as 1:2009cv01106
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera-Perez
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Perez v. Lindsay
as 1:2009cv01763
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera-Perez
Defendant:
Cameron Lindsay
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rivera-Rascon v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv02378
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera-Rascon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
