Cases 21 - 30 of 419
Pizarro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Pizarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Margaret Graham, Jessica Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
Rona Love
Defendant:
City Of New York, Faye Yelardy, James Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. State Classification Department of TDCJ et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
State Classification Department of TDCJ, Chief of the SCC Transfer Department, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawk v. Thompson et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hawk
Defendant:
Tracy Thompson, Ludwig Schneider, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Iverson et al
as 1:2021cv05602
Plaintiff:
Terrence T. Williams
Defendant:
J. Iverson, Michael Reilly, Lt. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Reilly et al
as 2:2021cv03295
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hamilton
Defendant:
John Reilly, DELAWARE COUNTY, Delaware County Board of Prison Inspectors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nierenberg et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
Alan Nierenberg, Carrie Cloud and Ellen Cloud
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Chris Magnus, Unknown Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REILLY v. INCH
as 4:2021cv00223
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Petitioner:
SEAN P REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REILLY v. INCH
as 4:2021cv00118
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Petitioner:
SEAN P REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
