Cases 21 - 30 of 634
Herrera v. Rosario et al
as 5:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Juan Isaiah Herrera
Defendant:
Fausto Rosario, J. Katich and Sumter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCADO ROSARIO v. PETERS
as 3:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO ROSARIO
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS and WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. GRULLON
as 2:2023cv03960
Plaintiff:
ANGEL I ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
J. GRULLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Stafford v. Dr. G. Rosario
as 23-12270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT STAFFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
G. ROSARIO
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. CORPORAL H. SOLIS et al
as 2:2023cv03687
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROASARIO-SANCHEZ and ANGEL ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CORPORAL H. SOLIS and DR. IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario Carrasquillo v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv05121
Petitioner:
Pedro Rosario Carrasquillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosario v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rosario
Defendant:
Lieutenant Williams, Correctional Officer Flemings, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
