Cases 21 - 30 of 1,039
DeBritto et al v. Rhode Island General Assembly et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Oneil Hernandez Malave, Timothy DeBritto, Edwin McGill and others
Defendant:
Rhode Island General Assembly, Rhode Island Superior Court and Rhode Island Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Soman v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Sterling L Soman
Defendant:
Sara L Robbins, Tracy L Thompson, Michael Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page (PS) v. Boggess et al
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Page
Defendant:
Joshua Boggess, Waseline, Rabas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chestnut v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Genard Denez Chestnut
Defendant:
Tony Anderson, David Snow, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 23-30886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
P. Reed, Capt., Joseph Westbrook, Msgt., Unknown Scott, Sgt. and others
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Shawn Thrush, Sterling Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatty v. Williams
as 2:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Sterling P. Beatty
Defendant:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
