Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Shaeffer Coleman v. State of Alabama, et al
as 11-11585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAEFFER COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, J. LAIRD, Circuit Court Judge, ROBIN DENISE SCALES, Assistant District Attorney, Assistant Attorney General and others
Carter v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
Leondus Carter
Defendant:
Gerardo Acevedo, Lois Lindorff, Wexford Health Care Source Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shaeffer Coleman
Defendant:
State of Alabama, J. Laird, Robin D. Scales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaeffer v. Keffer
as 4:2010cv00641
Petitioner:
Jennifer C Shaeffer
Respondent:
Joe Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 10-2464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant - Appellee:
Tim Reisch, Secretary of Corrections, Douglas Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, D. Sleyhouse, Deputy Warden and others
O'Connor v. Kelty et al
as 4:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Arian S. O'Connor
Defendant:
John Kelty, Jose Morales, Louis Clavarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl v. Reisch et al
as 4:2010cv04004
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Tim Reisch, Douglas Webber, D. Sleyhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nitz v. Campbell et al
as 3:2008cv00654
Plaintiff:
Naomi Nitz
Defendant:
C. Campbell, Jennifer Eiswerth, Mr. Naar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Deville
as 1:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Shaeffer Coleman
Respondent:
Deville and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Markill et al
as 1:2007cv01912
Plaintiff:
David J. Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly Markill, Deborah Paulson, Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
