Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Carey Jones v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20439
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAREY STEVEN JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00218
Petitioner:
Steven Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2014cv00964
Plaintiff:
Steven Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Ahmed and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Putnam v. David Traylor, et al
as 14-40668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARL PUTNAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DAVID TRAYLOR, Rains County Sheriff Department, MICHAEL GODWIN, Deputy, JOHN DOE 5, Sheriff Deputy, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Steven Jones v. Conrad Graber
as 14-55526
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
CONRAD GRABER
Robert Putnam v. David Traylor, et al
as 14-40155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARL PUTNAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DAVID TRAYLOR, Rains County Sheriff Department, MICHAEL GODWIN, Deputy, JOHN DOE FIVE, Sheriff Deputy, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00199
Petitioner:
Carey Steven Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Brewer et al
as 2:2013cv01510
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles L Ryan, Richard Allen Bock and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Steven Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03640
Petitioner:
STEVEN JONES, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Jones v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 13-12281
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
