Cases 21 - 30 of 51
COBBLE v. GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS JUDGES et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS JUDGES, GEORGIA COUNTY MAGISTRATE JUDGES, GEORGIA SUPREME COURT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poore v. California Supreme Court Judges et al
as 3:2016cv05980
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eric Poore
Defendant:
California Supreme Court Judges and California State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Smith
Defendant:
New York City and Supreme Court Judge Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Warden
as 15-2661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andre Youngblood
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, of Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center, City of New York, Detective Louis Pena, 6992 and others
Defendant:
Clinic, of Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center
Julian Rochester v. William Nettles, et al
as 15-5474
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM N. NETTLES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ALAN WILSON and others
Youngblood v. Pena et al
as 1:2015cv03177
Plaintiff:
Andre Youngblood
Defendant:
Louis Pena, Jesus Senchez, V.C.B.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Secretary of State
as 4:2015cv00202
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Secretary of State, US Texas Judges, Fifth Circuit Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
