Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Sowell v. Paulhamus et al
as 3:2012cv01971
Plaintiff:
Markale Al-samod Sowell
Defendant:
Jeff Paulhamus, Roy Snyder, Tim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2012cv02648
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES, GOVENOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Pitts, Jr. v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 12-55494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL PITTS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, Exec. Director, ASH, ALVAREZ, Hosp. Police Officer, AMANDA FERRERI, Hosp. Police Officer and others
Davlin v. Miller et al
as 8:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Davlin
Defendant:
Tim Miller and O. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hankins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv00953
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Morirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlister v. Tolar et al
as 3:2010cv00976
Plaintiff:
Keith W. McAlister
Defendant:
Josh Tolar, Tim Miller and Hershell D. Koger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlister v. Tolar et al
as 4:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Keith W. McAlister
Defendant:
Josh Tolar, Tim Miller and Hershell D. Koger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Earl Pitts, Jr. v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 09-56127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL PITTS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, Exec. Director, ASH, ALVAREZ, Hosp. Police Officer, AMANDA FERRERI, Hosp. Police Officer and others
Andrews v. Tennis et al
as 1:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Franklin Tennis, Jeffrey Rackovan, Erica Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Summers et al
as 4:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
George S Mason
Defendant:
Paul G Summers, Terry Stacey, Clay Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
