Cases 21 - 30 of 263
Vickers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2022cv01920
Petitioner:
Levertis Vickers
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomfield v. Vickers
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Kwentel Broomfield
Defendant:
Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
David Allen Vickers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vickers v. USA
as 1:2022cv00491
Petitioner:
David Allen Vickers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vickers v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
David Allen Vickers
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VICKERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01892
Petitioner:
DAVID ALLEN VICKERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Department of Veteran's Affairs
as 1:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
Asiya Vickers
Defendant:
Department of Veteran's Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Vickers v. USA
as 22-3146
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID W. VICKERS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Davis, Mr. Wayne Rickman, Mr. David Bosserman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
