Cases 21 - 30 of 288
BEALS v. PURCELL et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, ABIGAIL COOPER, SCOTT FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purcell v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Purcell
Defendant:
Mills, Peter Druckenmiller, Simon Whang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neff v. Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff
Defendant:
Walker, Armel, Brittain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPANN v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE SPANN
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, TIMOTHY HOLMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Jenkins v. Richard Brown, et al
as 23-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN and others
GREENLEE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILLMORE, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. RICE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JOHN POWERS, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING et al v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEVON STERLING
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K GREGORY
Defendant:
ROBERT E CARTER, JR, MR. LEOHR, JERRY SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
