Cases 31 - 39 of 39
David Newman v. Pizza Hut Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv05059
Plaintiff:
David Newman
Defendant:
Pizza Hut Corporation, Adrienne Jaurigui and Javier B. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Coley v. Thomas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Donald Coley
Defendant:
Thomas County Sheriff's Department, Thomasville Police Department and Pizza Hut of Thomasville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Riches v. Mack's Famous Boardwalk Pizza
as 08-8222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
MACK'S FAMOUS BOARDWALK PIZZA
Jonathan Riches v. Mack's Famous Boardwalk Pizza
as 08-7865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
MACK'S FAMOUS BOARDWALK PIZZA
Riches v. Mack's Famous Boardwalk Pizza
as 6:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Mack's Famous Boardwalk Pizza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Riches v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv05869
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation, Burger King, Wendy's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHES v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2007cv04009
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv04192
Defendant:
Marshall Bruce Mathers, III, Usama Bin Laden, Darryl F. Zanck Institute for Media Domination and Talmudic Studies, The and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Dominos Pizza et al
as 0:2007cv01028
Plaintiff:
James Edward McNeil
Defendant:
Dominos Pizza and Archie Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
