Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Jolley v. USA
as 1:2016cv11290
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Khyron Jolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jolley v. USA
as 1:2016cv01179
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darryle Anthony Jolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Savage v. Fallin, et al
as 16-6083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT G. SAVAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY FALLIN, individually and as Governor of the State of Oklahoma, ROBERT PATTON, individually and as Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, JASON BRYANT, individually and in his oficial capacity as Warden, James Crabtree Correctional Center and others
Gamez v. Perry et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Lupe Florencio Gamez
Defendant:
Rick Perry, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Fallin et al
as 5:2015cv01194
Plaintiff:
Kent G Savage
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Robert Patton, Jason Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Diaz v. A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al
as 15-50856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
A.M. STRINGFELLOW UNIT, et al, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DIVISION, through and by their Insurance Company Texas, FRANKLEY REECANA, Senior Warden, A.M. Stringfellow Unit, individual capacity and/or their official capacity and others
Diaz v. A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al.
as 5:2015cv00694
Defendant:
A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al., FNU Freeman, Elvis Allen Hightower and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jolley v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv01348
Plaintiff:
Lawyer Jolley
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Stevenson et al
as 6:2015cv01875
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R Stevenson, Amy Jolley, J Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
