Cases 31 - 40 of 28,820
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Haynes, . Stevenson, . Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collinge v. Bellendir
as 5:2024cv03096
Petitioner:
Adam B. Collinge
Respondent:
Brian Bellendir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Xavier Stewart v. Bob Gualtieri, et al
as 24-11935
Plaintiff:
XAVIER DEMERIS STEWART
Defendant:
BOB GUALTIERI, Individual and Official Capacity, BRUCE BARLETT, Individual and Official Capacity, KEN BURKE, Individual and Official Capacity and others
(PC) Gallegos v. Ebert et al
as 2:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
B. Ebert, E. Ngaya, Anthony F. Inconelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Wallace et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Rhonda B Wallace, LT. McMurray, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Thornton v. Wellpath Healthcare, et al
as 24-5553
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THORNTON
Defendant:
WELLPATH HEALTHCARE, W. WHITNEY, APN, SRINATH KAMINENI, M.D. and others
Hobbs v. Laprise et al
as 1:2024cv11503
Plaintiff:
Erick Rahumid Hobbs
Defendant:
Correctional B. Laprise, Associate Warden Underwood, Supervisory Chaplain Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
